Politics

Analysis: Brett Kavanaugh and the Midterm Effect

Three scenarios provide mixed bag on effect of tight Senate races

Reporters swarm Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, as she arrives in the Capitol on Tuesday, the day after President Donald Trump nominated Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court. Murkowski, who supported Kavanaugh’s nomination to the Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, is an expected to be a key vote on the current nomination. (Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call)

The selection of Brett Kavanaugh for the Supreme Court will have less of an impact on November’s midterms than you think. Sure, depending how the confirmation process develops, it’s possible the nomination could affect a handful of races, but the most likely scenario will not change the overall trajectory of the November elections.

Scenario 1 — Party-line pressure

The most likely outcome of the Kavanaugh nomination involves all 50 Republican senators voting to confirm him to the Supreme Court (with John McCain not voting).

After much hemming and hawing, the two Republican senators most apt to withhold their support, Maine’s Susan Collins and Alaska’s Lisa Murkowski, will ultimately back the nominee, saying they are comfortable with his record and temperament. Both of them voted to confirm Kavanaugh in 2006 when he was nominated to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals.

That’s all the support Kavanaugh needs to be confirmed.

At that point, a handful of Democratic senators up for re-election this year — most notably Heidi Heitkamp of North Dakota, Claire McCaskill of Missouri, Joe Donnelly of Indiana, Joe Manchin III of West Virginia and Bill Nelson of Florida — will have to decide whether to support the nomination to improve their argument that they are “independent” and “moderate,” or to oppose it to ensure that their bases remain strong and that liberal voters (who despise President Donald Trump and might see a vote for Kavanaugh as treason) turn out in November.

Watch: Trump Nominates Judge Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court

Each of those Democrats will have to decide what to do, and all of their choices involve risk. But their situations would be much worse if their votes were needed for confirmation.

Of the three scenarios presented here, this is clearly the best for the Democratic Party.

Kavanaugh would be confirmed, and voters’ attention could return to  Trump’s behavior, health care, tariffs and other issues.

Just as important, Democrats would be angry across the country and looking to even the score following the White House’s victory.

They would once again have an enthusiasm edge over Republicans, who could no longer make the midterms a referendum on the Supreme Court and would tend to feel as if they had won the war, not just a single battle.

It’s easier to motivate angry voters than those who are satisfied.

Scenario 2 — Democrats in demand

The second scenario is like the first, except with one or two Republicans opposing Kavanaugh, thereby putting Democratic senators in Republican states in the hot seat.

This scenario is terrible for those vulnerable Senate Democrats, who must either vote against the nominee in states where voters are likely to view Kavanaugh and Trump favorably or risk alienating their Democratic supporters by playing a direct role in the confirmation of a judge that many rank-and-file Democrats find wholly unacceptable.

If McCaskill, Heitkamp, Donnelly and Manchin vote against confirmation and the GOP comes up a single vote short, each one of the vulnerable Democrats becomes the “deciding” vote against a conservative, well-credentialed Supreme Court nominee who was selected by a president popular with Republicans.

That sounds like a recipe for defeat for those Democrats in the fall.

Watch: Senate Democrats Rally Against Kavanaugh at Supreme Court

Scenario 3 — Overtime

In terms of its impact on the 2018 midterms, the third scenario, which involves the Senate defeating (or at least delaying) Kavanaugh, looks even worse for Democrats.

If Kavanaugh’s nomination is defeated by a combination of 49 Democrats and one or two Republicans, the process to replace retired Justice Anthony Kennedy would continue through the elections, creating an issue that could well boost Republican enthusiasm, as it did in 2016, when the vacancy over the seat of the late Antonin Scalia, and Senate Republicans’ gamble in not considering President Barack Obama’s nominee, Merrick Garland, hung over the election.

Democrats have had an advantage in enthusiasm over the past year, but a high court fight could offset that advantage, producing larger Republican Senate gains in November and possibly minimizing Democratic gains in the House.

Ironically, those Senate gains would make it easier to confirm a very conservative Trump nominee after the midterms.

Obviously, dramatic news about Kavanaugh’s record or values that proves disqualifying would change the nature of the confirmation process.

Multiple Republicans voting against confirmation would also change things, since that would give all Senate Democrats an excuse for opposing confirmation.

But any events that prolong the replacement of Justice Kennedy — especially past the midterm elections — would elevate the Supreme Court fight in the minds of many voters, thereby improving GOP prospects.

Most Democrats don’t like the Kavanaugh nomination and would like to see a more moderate nominee. But they are playing a very weak hand now, and there is little reason to believe that the next hand they are dealt will be any better.

In fact, it might be worse.

Get breaking news alerts and more from Roll Call on your iPhone or your Android.